Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:39
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
‘Once in a Lifetime’ Photo of ISS Crossing the Sun as Solar Flare Erupts - PetaPixel
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
This decades-old Gmail trick is still my favorite email management hack - Android Police
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Becky Lynch wins the Intercontinental title at Money in the Bank - Cageside Seats
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What misfortune led to an important discovery?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
UPDATE: Additional measles exposure locations in Marquette, Delta counties - Upper Michigan's Source